Résumé

La cinquième mission du Gonja Project a duré six semaines, du 3 janvier au 13 février 2019. Elle s’est déroulée dans des conditions excellentes et a réuni dix archéologues, une géomètre/topographe, une dessinatrice/restauratrice, un archéobotaniste), vingt ouvriers recrutés localement et douze étudiants de l’Université du Ghana.

Deux axes de recherche ont été menés en parallèles : la poursuite de l’étude du site archéologique à Old Buipe et l’étude et le relevé des mosquées de Wechiau et Wuriyanga, toutes deux situés dans l’extrême nord du pays (Upper West Region et Upper East Region). C’est évidemment les travaux à Old Buipe qui ont mobilisé l’essentiel de nos forces, l’étude des mosquées de Wechiau et Wuriyanga pouvant être réalisée en quelques jours avec une équipe restreinte.

À Old Buipe, le levé du plan topographique de l’ensemble des vestiges archéologiques a été poursuivi à l’ouest et au sud-ouest, ainsi qu’au sud du site. Il sera achevé en 2020. La fouille a continué avec de nouveau résultats très satisfaisants dans les quatre secteurs ouverts ces dernières années (secteurs A, C, D et E). Une étude archéobotanique a également été entreprise à grande échelle, avec des restes carpologiques (macro-restes végétaux) assez abondants dans les sédiments et des résultats extrêmement positifs.

Les mosquées de Wechiau et Wuriyanga ont été étudiées (analyse architecturale, levé du plan bas et haut, photogrammétrie des élévations intérieures et extérieures, coupes architecturales). Wechiau complète la série de monuments caractéristiques de la région de Wa, qui sont fortement influencés par ceux de Kong en Côte d’Ivoire. Wuriyanga appartient à une autre famille de monuments, plus septentrionale et dépourvue de contreforts et de tour minaret.

 

Saison 2019

Introduction

Le projet de recherches archéologique Gonja Project porte sur le royaume ou état de Gonja et sur l’islamisation du nord du Ghana. Le royaume de Gonja a été formé au 16e siècle dans la partie nord de l’actuel Ghana, dans la zone de confluence des rivières Volta, et a perduré jusqu’au 19e siècle. Son histoire est connue par une série de sources textuelles rédigées localement en arabe à partir du 18e siècle et par les traditions orales, mais il n’a fait l’objet que de rares études archéologiques entre la fin des années 1960 et le début des années 1980. L’islamisation de la région semble être plus ou moins concomitante de l’expansion progressive du royaume par une série de conquête, mais ses modalités restent du domaine de l’hypothèse et, surtout, des points d’ancrages chronologiques précis manquent encore. Deux axes de recherches principaux ont été définis. L’un concerne l’étude archéologique de l’un des établissements majeurs de Gonja entre le 16e siècle et le début du 20e siècle, la ville de Buipe (actuellement Old Buipe), siège de l’une des chefferies de Gonja et emplacement de la plus ancienne mosquée connue par les sources textuelles. Le travail de terrain comprend sondages et fouilles plus étendues, ainsi qu’un relevé topographique de l’ensemble du site archéologique. L’étude des dernières mosquées anciennes de la région, qui sont encore mal connues et dont les dates de construction sont très disputées, constitue le second axe de recherche. Il comprend relevés des plans et des élévations des édifices, des analyses architecturales et différentes opérations permettant d’en préciser la date de construction.

Le projet se fait dans le cadre d’un partenariat entre l’Université de Genève et l’Université du Ghana-Legon et est codirigé par le requérant et les professeurs Kodzo GAVUA et Wazi APOH. Un premier programme triennal a été mené de 2015 à 2017, entièrement financé par la Fondation Suisse-Liechtenstein pour la Recherche Archéologique (SLSAFSLA) et un deuxième programme triennal a été engagé pour la période 2018–2020, auquel contribue également la Fondation Max van Berchem à partir de la campagne 2019. Un accent particulier est mis sur la formation des étudiants et archéologues ghanéens, avec la mise sur pied d’une fouille école dans le cadre des travaux menés à Old Buipe.

La cinquième mission du nouveau programme triennal 2018–2020 a duré six semaines, du 3 janvier au 13 février 2019. Elle s’est déroulée dans des conditions excellentes, tant avec les partenaires scientifiques ghanéens (Université du Ghana et Ghana Museums and Monuments Board), qu’avec les autorités traditionnelles, civiles et religieuses locales. La mission a compté huit membres suisses (cinq archéologues, une géomètre/topographe, une dessinatrice/restauratrice et un archéobotaniste), quatre membres ghanéens (trois archéologues et un étudiant avancés en archéologie) et une collègue (archéologue) venue du Nigeria, ainsi que vingt ouvriers recrutés localement. Durant les deux premières semaines de la mission, une douzaine d’étudiants de l’Université du Ghana (niveau BA) ont également été accueillis sur le site d’Old Buipe pour une école de fouille.

Deux axes de recherche ont été menés en parallèles : la poursuite de l’étude du site archéologique à Old Buipe et l’étude et le relevé des mosquées de Wechiau et Wuriyanga, toutes deux situés dans l’extrême nord du pays (Upper West Region et Upper East Region). C’est évidemment les travaux à Old Buipe qui ont mobilisé l’essentiel de nos forces, l’étude des mosquées de Wechiau et Wuriyanga pouvant être réalisée en quelques jours avec une équipe restreinte.

 

Old Buipe

À Old Buipe, le travail a compris la poursuite du relevé topographique du site archéologique et la poursuite des fouilles dans les quatre secteurs étudiés au cours des campagnes précédentes (A, C, D et E).

Le relevé topographique a été étendu dans la partie ouest et sud-ouest du site archéologique, ainsi que dans une partie au sud, au-delà des zones relevées en 2015. La méthode utilisée est la même que les années précédentes (relevé à la station totale, rendu des contours et des courbes de niveau des monticules archéologiques). Les nouvelles surfaces qui ont été couvertes mesurent environ 275 x 525 m (ouest) et environ 100 x 275 m (sud), soit près de 17.20 hectares en tout (Fig. 1). C’est une zone assez particulière, où l’on avait l’impression qu’il n’y avait que peu de vestiges et qui s’est révélée beaucoup plus étendue et plus riche que prévu. Les buttes archéologiques d’assez grandes dimensions y sont par contre souvent peu marquées dans le terrain (guère plus de 2 m au maximum) et aux contours irréguliers et pas toujours très bien défini. Il a fallu nettement plus de temps que prévu pour la couvrir et il n’est pas resté suffisamment de temps pour également faire le relevé du secteur au nord du village moderne. Cela se fera en 2020 et le plan topographique d’Old Buipe sera alors achevé. Une petite série de buttes plus éloignées au sud-ouest du site ont aussi été positionnées au GPS, mais n’ont par contre pas fait l’objet d’un relevé détaillé.

La fouille a été poursuivie dans les trois secteurs fouillés depuis 2015 (A, C et D) et dans le nouveau secteur ouvert en 2017 (E).

Genequand fig1 19

Fig. 1 Plan topographique d’Old Buipe (état en fin de mission 2019).

Dans le secteur A, la fouille n’a été étendue que sur une petite surface de 2 x 4 m à l’angle sud-est, portant l’ensemble de la surface ouverte à 104 m2 (Fig. 2). L’objectif de cette petite extension était de finir de dégager la pièce 14, partiellement fouillée en 2018 et dans laquelle se trouvait un important dépôt de céramiques et autres artefacts. En revanche, l’essentiel du travail de fouille cette année dans le secteur A s’est concentré dans les zones déjà ouvertes. Il s’est agit de fouiller complètement toutes les pièces qui ne l’avaient pas été (angle nord-ouest de la fouille, pièces 1, 10, 11, 12 et 13) et ou des sols ont été trouvés partout, parfois en deux états superposés. Dans la partie orientale de la fouille, qui correspond à une cour, la fouille a aussi été poussée plus profondément et une série de neuf tombes a été mise au jour. Toutes, sauf une d’adulte, sont des tombes d’enfants, la plupart en bas-âge. Ces tombes sont soit contemporaines du grand bâtiment en cours de fouille, soit légèrement antérieures (16e–18e siècle) ; la stratigraphie et la chronologie absolue vont encore devoir être travaillée. Tous les corps reposent en décubitus latéral, tête au sud et regard tourné vers l’est, et sont donc visiblement des tombes musulmanes. Dans la partie nord de la cour, un muret de partition a été mis au jour, ainsi que des sols en gravier de latérite relativement bien conservés de part et d’autres. Finalement, un sondage plus profond a également été mené dans la moitié nord de la pièce 5, où le terrain naturel a été atteint sensiblement plus profondément que ce qu’attendu. Deux tombes d’enfants/adolescents y ont également été trouvées, cette fois clairement antérieures au bâtiment, l’une en décubitus latéral, l’autre en décubitus dorsal. Mais surtout ce petit sondage profond a permis de mettre en évidence une phase d’occupation, avec des constructions en terre relativement bien conservées (40–50 cm d’élévations), nettement antérieure et séparée du bâtiment en cours de fouille par un épais remblai (Fig. 3). Elle repose sur le terrain naturel. Plusieurs prélèvements ont pu être fait pour dater au radiocarbone cette phase plus ancienne (sur et sous un sol ; résultats attendu pour l’été). Ces vestiges seront étudiés au cours de la prochaine campagne et nécessiteront la destruction d’une partie du bâtiment qui les recouvrent.

Genequand fig2 19

Fig. 2 Old Buipe, plan du secteur A.

Genequand fig3 19

Fig. 3 Old Buipe, secteur A, vue des vestiges de la phase plus ancienne dans le sondageFig. 3 Old Buipe, secteur A, vue des vestiges de la phase plus ancienne dans le sondageprofond (pièce 5) : mur (à droite) et sols primaire et secondaire (vers la gauche).

Dans le secteur C, la fouille a été agrandie en direction de l’ouest avec l’ouverture d’une nouvelle surface de 6 x 8 m, portant l’ensemble à 192 m2 (Fig. 4 et 5) Trois nouvelles pièces appartenant à l’aile nord du bâtiment ont été fouillées. Deux pièces de tailles moyennes (R13 et R 14) s’ouvrent directement sur la cour, alors que la troisième (R12), de loin la plus grande des pièces fouillées jusqu’à maintenant appartient à la seconde rangée. Il n’est pas encore certain s’il elle était accessible depuis la pièce R14 ou R11. La partie occidentale de la pièce (marquée R15 sur le plan) est caractérisée par la présence d’une longue plateforme surélevée de près de 30 cm et occupant toute sa largeur. Contrairement au reste du bâtiment, il y a très peu de mobilier abandonné in situ sur les sols de ces trois pièces. L’extension de la fouille cette année confirme que l’aile nord du bâtiment a été planifiée et construite dès l’origine avec au moins deux rangées de pièces. Il s’agit sans doute d’une maison à cour centrale – dont les ailes nord et est ont été partiellement dégagées –, qui a par la suite été agrandie au cours de deux phases successives par l’ajout de rangées de nouvelles pièces à l’est. Ce bâtiment est maintenant bien daté du 15e siècle et est abandonné à la fin du même siècle ou au tout début du suivant (datations radiocarbones 2015–2018; devis en attente pour les échantillons de 2019). Il faut relever la date précoce de cette construction qui présente une architecture de plan rectangulaire et complexe, impliquant un système de couverture plat en terrasse, déjà parfaitement maitrisé.

Genequand fig4 19

Fig. 4 Old Buipe, plan du secteur C.

Genequand fig5 19

Fig. 5 Old Buipe, locaux dégagés en 2019 (12/15 au premier plan à gauche, 13 à droite).

Dans le secteur D, la fouille a été agrandie une nouvelle fois en direction de l’est (4 x 9 m ; portant la surface fouillée à 160 m2), de manière à continuer à dégager la rangée de pièces bordant la grande cour du complexe central (Fig. 6 et 7). Cette extension a permis de dégager deux nouvelles pièces (pièces 9 et 10) et la fouille a également continué dans la pièce 8. Dans cette dernière il s’est agi de fouiller la moitié nord, en dessous du niveau de sol atteint en 2018, de manière a dégager complètement la structure empierrée qui se trouve en dessous. Cette structure, qui ressemble à une canalisation mais n’en est pas une, se prolonge vers le nord, de manière plus ou moins parallèle à celle fouillée les années précédentes sous les pièces 1 et 4. Elle se prolonge au delà de la berme nord. Les observations faites cette année permettent de penser que les lignes d’empierrement ont été placées contre un élément – peut-être une paroi de bois – qui a par la suite été démonté, avant que la tranchée centrale (son négatif) ne soit comblée. Elles ont également permis de revoir l’ensemble de la chronologie relative, sur laquelle on reviendra plus bas. Les pièces 9 et 10 sont respectivement carrée et rectangulaires et il est clairement établi que la pièce 10 est antérieure. Son sol et ses murs sont posés à un niveau nettement inférieur à ceux de la pièce 9, qui correspond plus ou moins avec le niveau de fonctionnement des deux structures empierrées. Contre le mur ouest de la pièce 10, une série de huit petits pots en céramique avec couvercles et deux coupelles a été trouvée. Tous sont partiellement pris dans une gangue de terre argileuse qui permet de les maintenir en place. Il faut vraisemblablement y voir un aménagement a caractère rituel. La pièce 9 a été construite dans un deuxième temps, après que les structures empierrées aient été comblées. Elle possède un niveau de sol primaire, au niveau de la base des murs ouest et sud, et un niveau de sol secondaire, près de 25 cm plus. Tous deux sont en graviers de latérite et bien conservés. Un aménagement spectaculaire a été mis en évidence sur le sol secondaire. Il s’agit d’une série de treize petits monticules en forme de pain de sucre et fait de terre argileuse rouge, qui sont alignés le long des murs ouest et nord (Fig. 8). Un quatorzième élément de même type est placé dans une embrasure – niche ou porte ? – dans le mur est de la pièce. Il s’agit certainement d’un sanctuaire et ces quatorze monticules de terre ont un rôle rituel et symbolique. À la lumière des nouvelles découverte, la chronologie relative de l’ensemble du secteur D a pu être revue. Les deux structures empierrées sont les plus anciennes, mais pourraient être en partie contemporaines des pièces 2, 5, 6 et 7 d’un côté et 10 de l’autre. Elles seraient ainsi encadrées par des pièces et il pourrait s’agir d’un dispositif d’entrée. La pièce 9 est ajoutée dans un second temps. Puis les deux structures empierrées sont désaffectées et comblées. Et, finalement, de nouvelles pièces, 1, 4 et 8, sont construites par dessus. De nouvelles datations radiocarbone sont attendues ; celles des années précédentes indiquaient une construction et une occupation du bâtiment entre le milieu du 17e et la fin du 18e siècle, alors que les structures empierrées pourraient avoir été utilisée et comblée entre le début du 16e et le milieu du 17e siècle. Dans tous les cas, les deux pièces 9 et 10, montrent de manière très nette la persistance de pratiques religieuses qui n’ont rien d’islamique, alors qu’une mosquée existe déjà à Old Buipe et que presque toutes les tombes datables des 16e–18e siècle des secteurs A et E sont de type musulman.

Genequand fig6 19

Fig. 6 Old Buipe, plan du secteur D.

Genequand fig7 19

Fig. 7 Old Buipe, vue du secteur D (au premier plan le local 9).

Genequand fig8 19

Fig. 8 Old Buipe, secteur D, détails du sanctuaire dans le local 9.

Dans le secteur E, tout à l’est du site, la fouille a continué en profondeur et sans extension. Les murs du bâtiment partiellement dégagé l’an passé ont été démonté pour continuer la fouille. Une phase de construction plus ancienne est apparue avec des pièces étroites et allongées dans la partie sud et des espaces plus irréguliers dans la partie nord (Fig. 9). L’emplacement et les alignements est-ouest des murs de cette phase ont été gardés à la suivante (fouille 2018). Ces constructions sont suivies, vers le bas, par un remblai difficile à caractériser, puis par le terrain naturel, atteint à une profondeur de près de 3.50 m depuis le sommet de la butte. Le terrain correspond à un affleurement de blocs de latérite, entre lesquels un abondant mobilier céramique est piégé, indiquant une occupation plus ancienne que les premières structures mises au jour. De nouvelles datations radiocarbone sont également attendues. Les datations précédentes donnaient une large fourchette entre le milieu du 15e et le début du 17e pour les niveaux fouillés en 2017 et 2018. Après avoir atteint le terrain naturel, il a été décidé en fin de campagne de ne pas prolonger la fouille de ce secteur, difficile à fouiller en raison de la profondeur des dépôts et la nature très élusive des structures. Cela permettra d’explorer une nouvelle zone du site lors de la campagne 2020.

Genequand fig9 19

Fig. 9 Old Buipe, secteur E, vue ne fin de fouille (en bas, au fond, le terrain naturel).

En marge de la fouille, une étude archéobotanique à été entreprise à Old Buipe par Louis Champion (UCL). Tous les sédiments prélevés entre 2015 et 2018 ont été traités, de même que de très nombreux autres prélèvements faits durant la campagne de fouille, faisant d’Old Buipe le site le mieux échantillonné d’Afrique de l’ouest (plus de 200 prélèvement dans autant d’unités de fouilles différentes). Contrairement à nos attentes, l’ensemble des sédiments s’est révélé riche en vestiges carpologiques (macro-restes végétaux). Flottation, tri et une grande partie des déterminations ont été faits sur place. Dans les grandes lignes et de manière très préliminaire, on constate l’absence complète des plantes originaires des Amériques, réputées avoir été diffusée très rapidement à l’intérieur des terres à partir du 16e siècle, mais aussi une bonne représentation de plantes arrivées par le nord, comme le coton, en plus des variétés locales.

 

Mosquées de Wechiau et Wuriyanga

Dans le cadre du second axe de recherche, deux mosquées traditionnelles ont été étudiées en détail, en suivant la méthode mise au point à Bole en 2015. Il s’agit des mosquées de Wechiau et Wuriyanga. La mosquée de Wechiau est un édifice abandonné et partiellement ruiné (Fig. 10). Elle a été assez fortement remaniée au cours de son existence, lui donnant un aspect extérieur un peu différent (tours, pinacles, contreforts etc.). L’analyse – facilité par l’état partiellement ruiné du monument – a toutefois démontré que le monument d’origine est extrêmement proche des mosquées de Wa/Dondoli et de Nakori et remonte sans doute aussi à la fin du 19e–début du 20e siècle. La mosquée de Wuriyanga se trouve dans l’extrême nord est du pays et est la seule de la série à appartenir à un autre type, car dépourvue de tout contrefort et de tour-minaret (Fig. 11). Comme toutes les autres, elle n’est probablement pas antérieur à la fin du 19e siècle. Le plan des deux édifices a été complètement relevé au niveau du sol (Fig. 12) et du toit-terrasse. Un relevé photogrammétrique de toutes les élévations extérieures et intérieures a aussi été réalisé, de même que des coupes architecturales (O–E et N–S) (Fig. 13). L’étude architecturale a été complétée par une enquête orale pour essayer de tracer les origines de ces monuments. Si l’on excepte la mosquée de Larabanga, où les conditions difficiles dans le village ne nous ont pas permis de travailler, la partie terrain du programme d’étude et de relevé des anciennes mosquées du nord Ghana est maintenant achevée. Une dernière tentative de travail sera faite en 2020 à Larabanga, mais il semble peu probable que la situation y ait beaucoup changé.

Genequand fig10 19

Fig 10 Mosquée de Wechiau.

Genequand fig11 19

Fig. 11 Mosquée de Wuriyanga.

Genequand fig12 19

Fig. 12 Plan de la mosquée de Wuriyanga dans son environnement.

Genequand fig13 19

Fig. 13 Coupes W-E et N-S dans la mosquée de Wuriyanga.

Dr Denis Genequand
Chercheur associé à l'Université de Genève
Directeur, Site et Musée romains d’Avenches (Vaud)

Summary

In February 2019 we conducted the second season of excavations at al-Sinnabra, following last year’s discovery of two rows of columns belonging to what appeared to be a hypostyle hall. This season we tried to find more of this hall and identify its borders. After an initial, somewhat frustrating period of work spent largely in identifying the extent of modern interventions (in particular, a system of irrigation pipes inserted at the same level as the hall), we were able, by the conclusion of the season, to make major progress by identifying a third row of bases, as well as an eastern border. Taken together with the northern qasir wall, the outline of the three-rowed hall begins to emerge, possibly bordered by a courtyard on the north, where no bases could be traced. The breadth of the hall still needs to be established, as our probes in the western part of the building may not have reached the foundations, which often are found to be preserved well below the floor level. A separate probe along the eastern face of the qasr revealed a previously unknown element there – possibly a processional walkway.

 

The 2019 Season

In February 2019 the second excavation season in al-Sinnabra was conducted. The aim of this season was to trace more remains of the hypostyle building that was partly revealed last year. Following the finds of last year we concentrated in two areas related to the two rows of column bases. In addition to a narrow probe in the large spoil heap covering the western part of the hall (which revealed no traces of construction at floor level), one excavation area was opened in the northern side and the second on the southern and eastern side of the previously discovered column bases. After a week of work in the northern area, we understood that it was damaged by modern interventions and erosion. Therefore, we concentrated our efforts on the southern part of the hall and on its eastern border.

 

Hypostyle hall

The concentration on the south side of the hall, between the previously exposed columns and the qasir wall, below the level of the gravel pavement, was rewarding, as a third row of column bases was exposed here. This row is composed of three reused marble bases and two built bases. The bases were built at similar intervals to those of the two northern rows and they are aligned with them. On the same lines of the bases, three west-east walls were also exposed (fig.1, w2-4), emerging from a north-south wall (fig.1. w1) that extended from the northern tower of the qasr and marks the eastern edge of the hall. A fifth wall, running from east to west, was also exposed (fig.1, w5). Damaged at three points by the column bases, this wall probably predates the hall (fig.2).

Daadli fig 1 19

Fig.1. Ground plan with the remains of the two excavation seasons.

Daadli fig 2 19

Fig.2. Column bases, looking east.

The intervals between the bases are approximately four meters, corresponding to the intervals within the rows and between each of them. This rhythm creates bays of four by four meters each. On the same four-meter interval, the northern wall of the qasir is situated. Therefore, we suggest that the northern qasir wall was a common wall for both structures, with its southern face facing the main basilica of the qasir and the northern one bordering the structure standing on the north (fig.3).

Daadli fig 3 19

Fig.3. Air view of the trenches.

The bases, the east-west wall and the northern wall of the qasir partly cut and were partly built on earlier walls that can be dated to the Hellenistic era due to the ceramic assemblage. This layer was covered with a layer brown earth mixed with small pebbles. This earth and pebbles layer was exposed on the same level of the bases and in some cases, it even covered them. Coins of the Arab-Byzantine type were found in this layer.

The reconstruction of the remains can be shaped to a hypostyle hall composed out of, at least, three aisles parallel to the northern wall of the qasir. Wall 1 can stand as the eastern border of this hall. In the current conditions, the northern and the western borders are missing. Three trenches that were opened on the western side failed to find any trace of more bases or a border wall in this side. This may still be hidden in the large spoil-heap of the excavations of the 1950s. Moreover, severe erosion on the northern side seems to rule out the possibility of finding any related traces.

Eastern wall

During the conservation of the site throughout the year some traces of a north-south wall were revealed on the eastern edge of the mound, parallel to the qasir wall. Therefore, a small trench was opened to track this wall. This wall seem to be a retaining wall to a walk way that extended along the eastern border of the qasir (fig.4).

Daadli fig 4 2 19

Fig.4. Eastern walkway and supporting wall, looking east.

Bathhouse

As reported last year, in February 2018, during our excavation season, a team of conservators launched a long-term maintenance project that lasted for almost a year. Among other things, they have brought to light some forgotten corners of the site, including the Umayyad bathhouse and parts of the palace itself (fig.5).

Daadli fig 5 19

Fig.5. General view of the qasir, from the west, after the conservation works. The bathhouse is at top right, above a large Bronze Age structure.

During the conservation works, the bath was cleaned and some details were revealed in them, mainly of the central pool and the two bathtubs on the south side of the main room. Moreover, the cleaning works revealed two building stages of the western wall (fig.6). It seems that an extension was attached to the lower course of the wall that came to create a base for the benches along the wall. This addition even covered the edges of the marble pavement, in this manner preserving some of the marble tiles, one of which bears a Greek inscription.

Daadli fig 6 19

Fig.6. Detailed plan of the bath after cleaned by the conservators.

Dr Tawfiq Daʿadli
Dep. of Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies and Art History
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem

 

Summary

            The remains of early Islamic Basrah are located approximately 15 kilometres to the south-west of the present city of Basra near the modern town of Zubair.  The location of the early Islamic city has not been forgotten over the centuries and was certainly known to early European travellers such as Carsten Niebhur.  There are a few monuments in the vicinity of the site including the tomb of Hassan al-Basri, the Talha ibn Zubair shrine (destroyed June 2007) and the mosque of Zbair ibn ‘Awam.  The most important surviving monument is the Mosque of Ali represented by the fired brick remains of a corner of the mosque which appears as a tower.  Although the location of the early Islamic site is known its precise extent and the nature of the sub-surface remains are poorly understood.  This is despite a large number of small scale excavations which have been carried out by the State Board of Antiquities and Heritage since 1979.  The excavations have only been reported in a summary form and the structural remains encountered have not been dated either by stratigraphy or analytical scientific methods (e.g. 14C).  During two field visits to the site we have been able to define the limits of the ancient site, develop some ideas about different periods of occupation, document the nature and location of some of the earlier excavations and produce a highly detailed drone survey of those parts of the site which have not yet been built upon ( we were not allowed to fly over inhabited areas).

Petersen 1 aerial photo

Fig. 1. Aerial photo of the Imam ‘Ali mosque taken in 1936 (Royal Air Force, now in British National Archives, Kew)

Background

             The historical and cultural importance of Basra as one of the first urban Muslim settlements cannot be overstated.  Information from early Islamic sources has enabled historians to identify many features of the social composition of the city including tribal groupings, religious affiliations as well as the identification of certain physical features such as the location of markets, water courses and cemeteries.  However, the relationship between the historical information and the modern topography of the area is not always clear.  There is also the problem that much of the historical information comes from later periods and may reflect subsequent re-interpretations of the development of the city. In view of these problems the archaeology of the city presents substantial opportunities for gaining an insight into the physical and social development of the city.

 

Location

            One of the most difficult aspects of understanding the archaeology of the city is the movement of the main settlement between the Shatt al-Arab and the dessert area to the south west.  During the Sasanian period the main urban settlement in the region was located at Uballa next to the Dijla al-Awra (modern Shatt al-Arab).  This Sasanian period settlement was located close to or probably on the site of the modern city of Basra (Kramers 2000).  The early Islamic settlement of Basra founded in the 630’s was located in the desert to the south west of Uballa and separated from it by an area of marshland liable to inundation during the winter.  The Islamic settlement developed around the remains of a small Sasanian period town (Vahistabdh Ardashir) known to the Arabs as al-Khuraybah (the small ruin).  During the tenth century a combination of factors including attacks of the Qaramatai from Bahrain caused the focus of settlement to shift again back to the banks of the Shatt al-Arab where the modern city of Basra evolved around the Ashar Creek (Longrigg 1979).  Already in the tenth century Uballah was described as being larger than Basra (Kramers 200).  However, it is probable that the site of the early Islamic city was not entirely abandoned and starting in the 1500’s the areas around Zubayr ibn Awam’s tomb began to develop into a small town.  The population of the new town al-Zubayr expanded in the eighteenth century with the arrival of Arab tribes seeking to escape the fanaticism of the Saudi Wahabis (al-Qatrani 2015).

 

Origins

            According to the Arab sources when the tribes first settled at Basra they chose to locate themselves on the west or desert side of the river so that they could be near their homeland.  It is also noticeable that they did not choose to settle within or near the existing Sasanian settlement of Uballa (Απολογν Εμποριον).  Whilst this may be correct Werner Nutzel has also pointed out that it would also have been very difficult for the Arab tribes to settle around the banks of the Shatt al-Arab which would have been inundated with water at the time due to the river Tigris breaking its banks in the year 629 (Nutzel 1982b: 149).  This was probably not a man-made catastrophe but was an event caused by the rupturing of dykes or levees alongside the river (Nutzel 1982a: 148).  The dykes probably ruptured because of additional pressure created by an accumulation of silt which raised the bed of the river above the surrounding plains.  In any case the result was the creation of a vast inland lake (Lake Hammar) between Kufa and the present position of Basra.  Whilst the port of Uballa may have escaped inundation it would certainly not have been a desirable location at this time.

 

Exploration

            First, it should be pointed out that the site of the early Islamic city was never entirely forgotten and was known to both residents and visitors to the area.  For example, when the Ottoman Admiral Sayyid Ali Reis came to Basra in 1554 to take command of the Ottoman Indian Ocean fleet after the execution of Piri Reis, he made a visit to the ruins of the early city to see the tombs of Hasan Basri, Talha, Zubayr ibn Awam, and Anas-bin-Malik (Sayyid Ali Reis 1577).  In the eighteenth century the German Danish explorer Carsten Niebuhr came to Basra on his return from India and made a visit to the site of the early Islamic city.  He observed the ruins of the ancient city and also speculated on the reasons for its decline (Niebuhr 1780: 297–300).  The first systematic attempt to reconcile the modern topography of the site with historical sources was carried out by Louis Massignon based on a brief visit in 1907 and a more extended visit in 1945 (Massignon 1954).  This account has served as the basis for most subsequent reconstructions of the early Islamic city and remains the most important work on the subject. The first archaeological investigations of the site took place during the 1970’s and 1980’s in the face of the expansion of the modern settlement of Zubayr and were carried out by the State Organization of Antiquities of Iraq (see below).

 

Topography

            The present-day topography of the Zubayr region is extremely complex and contains a multitude of features from different eras.  It should also be noted that the region has suffered extreme environmental degradation in recent times as a result of the growth of industrial installations, military activity and processes associated with climate change (Jabbar and Zhou 2011).  As a result some of the surface features which may have given some indication of the history of the site have either vanished or have been obscured by later events.  Despite these problems there are certain major features and landmarks which can help in reconstructing the ancient topography of the town.

            In the first place there are the graves or shrines of prominent early Islamic figures of Hasan al-Basri, Talha ibn Ubayd and Zubayr ibn ‘Awam which have in some form survived to the present day.  The historic testimony of figures such as Ibn Battuta, Sayyid Ali Reis and Carsten Niebuhr lends some authenticity and continuity to the identification of these shrines.  Added to these is the mosque of Imam ‘Ali which is known both through the historical sources mentioned above, through archaeological and through standing remains (see below).

            The second category of features is canals and watercourses.  These are more problematic as there have been many later irrigation, drainage and navigation channels which have been excavated within the area.  As early as 1764 Carsten Niebuhr observed the significance of a water channel linking the Euphrates near Kufa in the north to an inlet from the Persian Gulf known as Khor Abdullah.  In the eighteenth century this channel was known to the local inhabitants as Dsjarra Zaade or Hasfe Zaade. Niebuhr identified this channel as the ancient Pallacopas canal excavated in the Neo-Babylonian period perhaps as early as the seventh century B.C. Carsten Niebuhr observed that in his time the channel was dry and suggested that this was one of the reasons that the early Islamic city was abandoned.  It is not certain when the water in the canal stopped flowing but the presence of a fifteenth or early sixteenth century bridge (Qantarat Kiri Sa’ada) over the canal near Kufa suggests that is was still full of water at this date.

Petersen 2 canalbank

Fig. 2. Plaster layers visible on the bank of ancient channel which loops around the mosque on the east side. (tenth century and earlier).

            Massignon built on the work of Niebuhr and was able to identify two further canals mentioned in historical sources which were the Nahr al-Ma’qil and the Nahr al-Ajjana, the first identified through aerial photographs and the second identified by a geologist from the Iraq Petroleum company.  Satellite images of the site from 2017 show the area between the Hammar Lake to the north and Khor Zubayr (formerly known as Khor Abdullah) are now connected by the Basra canal (Shatt al-Basrah) which was completed in 1983.  It is not clear to what extent this new canal replicates the route of the ancient canal although Massignon locates the Pallacopas canal further west, between the mosque of Imam ‘Ali and the town of Zubayr.  He also places the original settlement on the west bank of the Pallacopas canal which if correct means that it would be on the opposite side from the congregational mosque which seems unlikely.  One of the more useful attempts to reconstruct the city uses the canal network as base map for locating the suqs.  However, the base map is schematic and although the relationship between the canals may be correct their exact form and relationship to known features is difficult to decipher.  There have been several other attempts to reconstruct the layout of the early city but all have met with the same problem that there are few sources which give physical descriptions (see for example Wheatley 2001: 245, fig. 17).

 

Archaeological Excavations

            The archaeological excavations carried out during the 1970’s and 1980’s were mostly carried out by the State Organization of Antiquities to mitigate against the expansion of the modern town of Zubayr and also the construction of installations connected with the petrochemical industry.  Structures uncovered included a large compound enclosed within a wall strengthened by semi-circular buttresses, a series of houses decorated with stucco, each with its own prayer room marked by a raised floor with a stucco panel indicating the mihrab.  One of the most interesting excavations revealed an industrial oil press.  Also in 1976 a map was produced showing the limits of the archaeological site within which building was restricted.  In addition, the University of Basra carried out excavations within the vicinity of the Great Mosque aimed at establishing the dimensions and architecture of this very important building revealing its immense size presence of the sandstone columns quarried from Jabal Sanam.  In recent years since 2006 there have been further excavations within the area of Old Basra mostly in advance of new construction projects.

 Ceramics

            In 1952 some kiln furniture and a series of ceramic fragments of bowls and cups reportedly found in the region of Basra were presented to the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York.  Whilst the circumstances of the find are mysterious it is generally accepted that the reported location is correct and that the ceramics date to the ninth and tenth centuries.  Petrographic studies of the ceramics carried out in 1990 indicate that similar ceramics from a large number of sites throughout the Gulf and Indian Ocean region were also probably made in Basra (Mason and Keall 1991).  Whilst this finding has been tempered by more recent research (Priestman 2011) suggesting that there may have been a number of production centres in southern Iraq the fact remains that archaeological investigation of ceramics from Basra is of international importance.

Survey Work in 2017-18

            Two sessions of fieldwork have now been carried out at the early Islamic site in 2017 and 2018 by Alistair Northedge and me.  During the first session we carried out a rapid survey of the whole site and the surrounding region to get an idea of how the site relates to the complex local topography in particular ancient canals, earlier pre-Islamic sites, standing monuments and shrines, as well as the natural environment which includes wetlands and stony dessert.  The second season comprised a detailed aerial photogrammetry as well as a surface survey. The field work took place during May and June 2018. The priorities were:

  1. Defining the extent of the early Islamic site.
  2. Identifying the location of previous archaeological excavations.
  3. Examination of surface material to get an idea of occupation in different areas of the site.
  4. Produce a detailed photogrammetric survey of the site using a drone
  1. Extent of the early Islamic site

            It is assumed that the mosque of Ali stands at or near the centre of the early Islamic site but the outer boundaries are not well known.  The State Board for Antiquities and Heritage have produced a map showing the legal boundaries of the archaeological site which seems to relate to property ownership rather than the actual limits of early Islamic remains.  In any case the precise boundaries of the ancient city were not well understood.  However examination of 1970’s satellite images as well as 1930’s maps indicated a defensive wall two and a half kilometres to the west of the Congregational Mosque.  The wall only appears on the western and southern sides of the site (marked in red on Fig 4) and appear to pass through the town of Zubair.  Examination of this feature on the ground indicated that the wall was at least three metres high and approximately two metres wide (Fig 3).  The wall appears to have been built predominantly of pise although mud bricks and fired bricks were also present.

Petersen fig 3

Fig 3. Remains of city wall (red line in Fig 4)

            The eastern limits of the site can be defined by a line describing the edge of the land subject to flooding either on a daily (tidal) or seasonal basis (marked in blue on Fig 4).  Also of interest is a deep channel which also runs from north to south (marked in yellow on figure 4).

            Within the darker area (area of inundation) to the north east there are a series of white lines which may indicate ancient areas of cultivation as well as ancient roads.

Petersen fig 4

Fig 4. Corona Image showing line of city wall (red) ancient canal (yellow) and edge of flood zone (blue)

2. Location of previous archaeological excavations

            One of the main priorities of this fieldwork was to identify the location and character of archaeological excavations which have already been carried out.  Summary publication of numerous excavations carried out in Basra during the 1970’s to 1990’s have appeared in SUMER (The official journal of the State Board of Archaeology and Heritage).  In addition there is information on archaeological work in Basra in a book published in Sharjah by Abd al-Sattar al-Azawi.  The excavations reported in SUMER give approximate details of location of excavations but little information on any structures or finds within the excavated areas.  The publication by ‘Abd al-Sattar deals primarily with the mosque excavations as well as the restoration work carried out. In addition to these know archaeological excavations there appear to be numerous archaeological excavations since the 1990’s which are unpublished.

            During the course of the field work we were shown six excavated sites (not including the Congregational Mosque) which have been conserved and in one case provided with a roof.  Plans of some of these building appear in the summary publications and in other cases plans have been located in the archives in Baghdad.  One of the conserved building had the remains of a serdab (underground chamber) located in the courtyard.  Unfortunately the date of the excavated buildings was in most cases unclear although ceramics in the vicinity indicate that they could be related to later occupation (see below).

Petersen fig 5

Fig 5. Fired brick remains in excavation in Area B

3. Surface material

            The ceramics of old Basra are important both as an indicator of the dating for various parts of the site and also because Basra was known as a very important ceramic production centre.  Given the huge size of the site and the need to gain some idea of any differentiation of occupation over the area the site was divided into three zones (A, B and C) separated by the three major rods which lead east to west.  There is a possibility for adding further zones as well as subdividing each zone into small areas.  During this first phase of fieldwork collection of ceramics was limited to areas around known excavation sites in order to get some idea of the dating and character of these areas.  All diagnostic sherds were photographed and drawn.

Petersen fig 6

Fig 6. Site of Early Islamic Basra Divided into Survey Areas

            Preliminary results indicate ceramics form the thirteenth century (e.g. Iranian stone-paste) to eighth century (white ware) and earlier.  As all the ceramics collected were surface material they can only be taken as indicative rather than definitive evidence of occupation in particular areas of the site.

Petersen fig 7

Fig 7. Ceramic finds from Area A. Sherds A and B are Iraqi White ware bowl fragments, C is a fragment of a small Chinese Porcelain bowl

4. Photogrammetric survey

            The UAV survey was carried out using a Phantom Quadracoptor at a height of 150 metres and photographed the two main unoccupied areas of the site (security restrictions meant that we were unable to use a fixed wing drone which would have covered a much larger area).  The resultant set of overlapping images were then linked to fixed points on the ground which were located using a Differential GPS Total Station.  The accuracy of the terrain modelling was then checked using a mobile antenna.  The resultant photomosaic which is still being processed will give a 3D relief map of the surveyed areas with an accuracy of 2cms.  This will form the base for a archaeological map of the whole site which will include information derived from survey work, previous excavations and archive material.

Professor Andrew Petersen 
School of Archaeology, History and Anthropology
University of Wales Trinity Saint David

Petersen fig 8

Fig 8. Frank Stremke (UAV Specialist) calibrating camera on drone

Summary

Madīnat al-Zahrāʾ was the capital of the 10th century Umayyad caliphate in al-Andalus and is today one of the most important sites of Islamic culture in the west. In 2018 Madīnat al-Zahrāʾ was inscribed in the UNESCO World Heritage list. A five-year project is currently dedicated to the investigation of the Plaza de Armas, the main public square of the caliphal city. The aim of the field season 2018/2019 was the excavation of a hitherto unknown building on the eastern side of the plaza. The building was a pavilion-like structure erected on a 3.5 m high platform. The ground plan was dominated by a T-shaped hall, reminiscent of similar halls found at Samarra and Fustat. The only examples of this type known so far to the west of Egypt have been found in Fatimid palaces at Aǧdābīyā (Libya) and Ṣabra al-Manṣūriya (Tunisia). A geomagnetic survey revealed that the newly discovered building formed part of a larger compound, which may at first have served an administrative purpose. In a later phase the building appears to have been remodeled to be used as a stable for horses, possibly by visitors that dismounted in the adjoining Plaza de Armas. The building was abandoned in the 11th century and subsequently deteriorated gradually. A coin of John II of Castile (r. 1406–1454) found in a trench offers the first concrete proof from Madīnat al-Zahrāʾ that the walls of the site were dismantled for the construction of the nearby monastery of San Jerónimo de Valparíso. The excavation of this season has revealed not only a building of unique typology, but has added greatly to our understanding of the function of the Plaza de Armas and its overall development.

 

Report of the 2018-19 season of work at Madīnat al-Zahrā’

Madīnat al-Zahrā’ was founded in 325 AH/936 AD by ʿAbd al-Raḥmān III as the capital of the western Umayyad caliphate. The city with its palaces, gardens, mosques and workshops quickly became the cultural center of the West, rivaling cities like Bagdad and Cairo in the East. Because of its importance and state of preservation, the archaeological site was inscribed this year – in July 2018 – in the UNESCO World Heritage list. The site has since received increased media attention, and a significant rise in tourism.

At Madīnat al-Zahrā’ archaeological work has been conducted for more than a century. R. Velázquez Bosco (from 1911 to 1923), F. Hernández Jiménez (from 1923 to 1975) and others brought to light the central area of the caliphal palace, including the famous Salón Rico. Comprehensive restauration work was carried out thereafter by R. Manzano Martos from 1975 to 1985. A. Vallejo Triano, director of the site from 1985 to 2013, lead a thorough reinvestigation and restauration of several building complexes, oversaw the construction of a well-equipped site museum and published a monumental book on the site.

Unlike the central palace area, little is known so far of the city and the subsidiary palaces of Madīnat al-Zahrā’. The aim of the current project is the study of the so called Plaza de Armas, a large public square to the east of the zone excavated to date (Fig. 1). The plaza served as the main intersection between the palace and the city. To the west of the square lies the palace, to the south the congregational mosque of the city, to the east a so-far unknown building. The investigation of the plaza and its surrounding buildings offers new insights on how the caliph interacted with society and how this interaction developed over time.

mini Arnold Fig 1 199

Fig. 1: Madīnat al-Zahrā’ (LIDAR SCAN of the Instituto Geográfico Nacional 2014). The location of the Plaza de Armas is indicated in red.

Work at Madīnat al-Zahrā’ is currently conducted within the framework of an agreement signed between the Junta de Andalucía and the German Archaeological Institute in 2015. In May 2017 a five-year project (“Proyecto General de Investigación”) directed by F. Arnold and A. Montejo Córdoba (director of Madīnat al-Zahrā’), was approved by the Junta de Andalucía, with the aim of investigating the Plaza de Armas. The aim of the first season of field work (in June and July 2017) was the investigation of the portico on the western side of the plaza. The second season – which is the subject of this report – was carried out in June and July 2018, again in collaboration with A. Canto García of the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Participants were F. Bastian, A. Braveman, K. Czarnitzki, J. Garzón, M. Hofmann, W. Jablonska, H. Lehmann, I. O. Roibu, R. Stolle, A. Ugolini, Y. Yosuoka and A. Zamorano Arenas. In addition, geophysical work was conducted in October 2018 by T. Herbich and R. Ryndziewicz.

Over the course of the past year the project has increasingly become the platform for a number of other undertakings. The aim of these projects is to place the investigation of the site on an international footing and thus intensify the study of Madīnat al-Zahrā’ in all its aspects. Regular meetings of the project members foster the exchange of information and ideas. The first meeting took place in March 2018. A second meeting is planned for July 11th-12th, 2019. Currently studies of glass objects (N. Schibille and A. Zamorano, funded by the ERC), metal objects (A. Ugolini) and architectural elements (Y. Yasuoka, funded by the Japanese Academy of Science) are under way. A project aimed at a reinvestigation of the so called Salón Basilical has been approved by the German Research Foundation (Technical University of Berlin). Independently, C. Duckworth from the University of Newcastle has been conducting a geophysical survey of the site, initially aimed at identifying workshop areas in the city. Taken together, these projects greatly increase our understanding of Madīnat al-Zahrā’ and its development.

 

Excavation work conducted in 2019

The aim of the second campaign of field work at Madīnat al-Zahrā’ was the investigation of a building on the eastern side of the Plaza de Armas (Fig. 2). The area has never been the object of archaeological work before. The topographic survey conducted by F. Hernández in 1923 revealed the eastern limit of the plaza and indicated the location of a singular building to the east. Since then, scholars including R. Castejón and A. Vallejo Triano interpreted this building as a multi-naved hall similar in design to the Salón Basilical and the Salón Rico. A clear understanding of the nature and meaning of this building is essential for the interpretation of the Plaza de Armas and its function.

mini Arnold Fig 2 199

Fig. 2: The Plaza de Armas and adjoining buildings (drawing F. Arnold).

A geomagnetic survey conducted in 2017 had revealed a monumental portico along the eastern limit of the Plaza de Armas, similar to the portico on its western side. Beyond this portico the ground is divided into two terraces, an upper terrace to the north located more or less on the same level as the Plaza de Armas, and a lower terrace to the south. On the upper terrace a distinctive, tell-like hill is visible in the topography, which constitutes the remains of the supposed multi-naved building (Building 63).

In June 2018 the surface of this hill was cleared of vegetation, revealing the remains of several walls built of ashlar masonry (Fig. 3). Over the course of three weeks, five sections were excavated with the aim of gaining information on the structure and function of Building 63 (Fig. 4). In section 1, at the southern foot of the hill, the remains of a portico were found buried beneath a thick layer of debris (Fig. 5). The portico appears to have been constructed against a platform, which formed the foundation for a pavilion-like building (Fig. 6). In order to clarify the ground plan of this building, sections 3 and 4 were dug on top of the platform. In addition, section 2 was excavated to the south of section 1, revealing the southern of the terrace on which Building 63 stood and a ramp connecting this terrace to the adjoining lower terrace. In sections 1–5, five phases of construction, use and destruction could be differentiated.

mini Arnold Fig 3 199

Fig. 3: View from Building 63 across the Plaza de Armas, with the western portico in the background (photo F. Arnold).

mini Arnold Fig 4 199

 Fig. 4: Ground plan of Building 63 with the location of Sections 1-5 (drawing F. Arnold).

mini Arnold Fig 5 199

Fig. 5: Remains of the portico of Building 63 covered by debris (photo M. Pijuán).

mini Arnold Fig 6 199

Fig. 6: Southeast corner of the platform of Building 63 (photo M. Pijuán).

Phase 1

In the first phase a 25.7 m wide, 19.7 m deep and 3.5 m high platform was erected. On top of the platform stood a pavilion-like building, which occupied the entire area of the platform. The remains excavated so far suggest that a 23.7 m wide and 3.1 m deep hall (E3) was located along the southern outer wall of the building, stretching along its entire façade (Fig. 4). Openings in the façade would have provided an impressive view across the city of Madīnat al-Zahrā’ and the surrounding landscape. In the central axis of the building a second, 4.8 m wide and 13.2 m deep, iwan-like hall (E4) opened onto the front hall (E3), thus forming a T-shaped ground plan. The two halls were connected by a 3.4 m wide opening, which appears to have been spanned by a wide arch. A step constructed of marble slabs led from the front hall (E3) to the 10 cm higher back hall (E4). The organization of the side rooms located in the northwestern and northwestern corners of the pavilion (E5 and E6) still needs to be clarified by further excavation. Also unclear is how the pavilion was accessed from the outside. A ramp or staircase may have been located in the back.

T-shaped ground plans of this kind are well known from the Near East, particularly from Abbasid Sāmārra and al-Fusṭāṭ. The only examples known so far to the west of Egypt are found in the Fatimid palaces at Aǧdābīyā (Libya) and Ṣabra al-Manṣūriya (Tunisia). At Madīnat al-Zahrā’ the influence of T-shaped ground plans has been noted in the Salón Rico and the house of Ǧaʿfar. The new building appears to be a much more explicit copy of the Near Eastern prototypes, however.

The results of the geomagnetic survey suggest that the pavilion stood inside a large, tripartite compound, which at first lay outside the confines of the palace of the caliph (see below, Fig. 9). The orientation of the compound diverges slightly from that of the palace area. The compound may at first have served an administrative purpose, the pavilion functioning as the reception hall of a high official. The compound appears to predate the construction of the city wall and thus to the 940’s, soon after the foundation of Madīnat al-Zahrā’.

 

Phase 2

In a second phase, a portico was added to the southern side of the platform (Fig. 4, E2). The 25.6 m long and 5 m wide portico appears to have comprised seven pillars. It is the first portico found at Madīnat al-Zahrā’ which is open to three sides. So far an L-shaped pillar at the southeastern corner has been excavated, as well as two square pillars in the center (Fig. 5). The pillars were furnished with a polished lime plaster, and a thicker dado at the base. The portico may have supported a kind of balcony, which would have allowed visitors to exit the hall of the pavilion and enjoy the view across the landscape (Fig, 7a).

mini Arnold Fig 7 199

Fig. 7: Reconstruction of Building 63 in Phase 2 (top) and Phase 3 (bottom) (drawings F. Arnold).

The area surrounding the pavilion (E1) was now paved with limestone slabs. To the south, the ground was reinforced by a terrace wall. Along the inner side of this wall the remains of an underground canal were found which may have served to drain water from the neighboring Plaza de Armas. The building activity appears to be contemporary with the construction of the city wall and the two porticos of the Plaza de Armas, all dated to the 950’s CE.

 

Phase 3

Building 63 was later put to a different use. Both in the portico (E2) and the upper hall (E4) benches with were constructed along the walls (Fig. 4 and 6). Basins on top of the benches and holes along the edges suggest that animals were now kept here, the basins serving as troughs for feeding the animals. At the same time, the floor of the portico (E2) and the surrounding area (E1) was raised and paved will cobble stones. Elsewhere at the site such pavements are common in areas frequented by horses, for example in the streets and ramps leading up to the palace area. In addition a wall was added to the southern edge of the terrace to close the area off. A ramp now connected the terrace to the adjoining lower terrace (Fig. 7b). All these elements suggest that the area was now used by animals, presumably horses.

The location of Building 63 on a raised platform and the high terraces did not make the area very suitable for keeping animals. The change in use indicates on the one hand that the original function of the building – probably in the context of the state administration – was no longer needed or had been shifted to another area. On the other hand the change is indicative for the heavy use of horses in the neighboring Plaza de Armas. According to contemporary sources visitors usually arrived at the palace on horseback and dismounted near its entrance. Building 63 may have served as a short-term stable for these horses. In addition, the plaza may have been used as a training ground for military horses. Such a function is attested for the area outside the palace gate in the city of Córdoba.

The date for the change in function is not yet clear. The role of horses in the military and in palace protocol appears to have increased in the time of al-Ḥakam II (r. 961–976). The changes might have been effected later, however, either while al-Hišam lived at Madīnat al-Zahrā’, or when the site was used as the head quarter of the army of Sulaymān al-Mustaʿīn in 1010 CE.

 

Phase 4

Unlike in the portico on the western side of the Plaza de Armas, no indication of destruction by fire was observed in Building 63. Instead, a fine layer of sediments suggests that the building stood empty for some time and deteriorated gradually. First the roof collapsed, creating a layer of roof tiles (Fig. 8). In the T-shaped hall only few roof tiles have been found. Instead a large quantity of fragments from a brick pavement was discovered which may originate either from a second story or from a roof terrace. Subsequently the walls deteriorated and collapsed, creating an up to 4 m thick layer of debris.

mini Arnold Fig 8 199

Fig. 8: Profile through the destruction debris covering the walls of Building 63 (drawing F. Arnold and Y. Yasuoka).

 

Phase 5

At a later time the stones of the building were reused for construction projects elsewhere. In many cases trenches were observed during the excavation of the debris which originated from the demolishing of the walls, sometimes down to their foundations. The trenches were later filled with destruction debris, usually composed of broken blocks.

In one of the trenches a coin with the name of John II of Castile was found, providing the first concrete evidence for the dating of the demolition of the walls. During the reign of John II (r. 1406–1454) the monastery of San Jerónimo de Valparíso was under construction. The monastery is located only 500 m to the northeast of the excavation area and in large parts built of stones originating from buildings of the 10th century. It is therefore more than likely that Building 63 was demolished for this purpose.

The ruined remains of Building 63 were subsequently covered by a layer of earth originating from the decomposition of the growing vegetation. On the surface a coin dating to the reign of Philip IV of Spain was found, minted in Segovia in 1622.

 

Geomagnetic survey

In October 2018 T. Herbich of the Polish Academy of Sciences was able to extend the geomagnetic survey begun in 2017 to encompass the entire Plaza de Armas and the area to the east. Because of the irregular topography, heavy vegetation and disturbances by modern constructions like metal fences etc. the conditions of the area are not favorable to such a survey. The results are nevertheless of great significance for an understanding of the urbanistic structure of the area (Fig. 9).

mini Arnold Fig 9 199

Fig. 9: Results of the geomagnetic survey of 2017 and 2018 in the area of the Plaza de Armas (T. Herbich).

On the geomagnetic image the continuation of the city wall can be traced, as well as the highway running alongside its outer face. No indications for towers are visible, suggesting that the city wall was constructed in this section without such towers. Some walls can be identified outside the city wall, suggesting that buildings existed also outside the limits of the city wall. The most interesting result inside the city walls regards the orientation of the buildings, which differs from the orientation deduced from topographic surveys. The geomagnetic image suggests that the Building 63 excavated this season stood inside a larger compound, which was divided into three sections. Each section comprised an upper terrace occupied by buildings and a lower terrace, possibly an open courtyard (or garden). Building 63 occupies the upper terrace of the westernmost section of the compound.

 

Documentation and study of archaeological materials

During the excavation some 564 fragments of pottery were recovered, the majority in the debris of Phase 4 (Fig. 10). For the most part the pottery can be dated to the second half of the 10th century and include 174 fragments of glazed pottery (15 pieces of “verde y manganeso”). A few sherds may derive from the 15th century, from the time when the building was being dismantled.

mini Arnold Fig 10 199

Fig. 10: Study of roof tiles in the courtyard of the museum of Madīnat al-Zahrā’ (photo A. Ugolini).

Interesting are the finds of metal objects, which were studied by A. Ugolini. Most frequent are iron nails, some up to 25 cm long, originating from the roof construction and the doors of the building. Several applications of doors were identified, including a half-moon shaped example. An iron trowel was found in the debris, which may originate from the construction of Building 63 in the 10th century rather than its demolition. Among the debris of the 15th century two horseshoes were recovered.

In the debris (Phase 4) some animal bones were found, which C. Liesau (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) identified as deriving from cattle, sheep and/or goats. Interesting is the shell of a scallop (“shell of St. James”), which was found in a trough of Phase 4. It may have served as food or as a tool.

Botanical remains gained from earth samples by flotation were studied by M. O. Rodríguez (University of Jaén). Most frequent are the remains of black pine and Aleppo pine (Pinus nigra and Pinus halepensis), which were both used as construction material, especially for the roof of buildings. Remains of olive, plum and almond trees might point to cultivation.  Remains of ash, evergreen oak, mastic, phyillyrea, and willow trees probably derive from vegetation subsequent to the abandonment of the site.

Dr. Felix Arnold
German Archaeological Institute, Madrid, Spain

 

Summary

            In February 2018 we carried out a three-week excavation season at Khirbet al-Kerak/Tel Bet Yerah, now securely identified with Ṣinnabra, perhaps the earliest qasr (Caliphal estate) of the Umayyad dynasty.  The excavation was accompanied by an intensive archival survey and ground-truthing of previous documentation, both necessitated by a long history of ground-level and subsurface interventions by the National Parks Authority and the Kinneret cemetery groundskeepers that had to be disentangled from the ancient remains.  As we noted in our initial request, the poor preservation of the buildings, at foundation level only, compounded by the inadequate methods of the early excavation and later interventions, meant that any surviving remains would have to be sought in previously untouched areas, north of the fortified compound.  This was also identified as the possible location of the palace mosque.

            The results of our excavation are extremely promising: after removing invasive vegetation, intrusive backfills and random elements placed by groundskeepers in the 1960s-1980s, the new excavations found evidence for a large paved court extending north of the fortified enclosure, dated by coins to the 7th century CE.  Just beneath its surface, the tops of at least two rows of large pillar bases, each of them over one meter in diameter, made of stone-and-mortar concrete and placed at regular intervals, point to the existence of a large hypostyle hall, similar in conception to the halls of contemporary mosques in nearby Tiberias and in Damascus.  The court and hall were clearly planned and built in concert with the main enclosure, sharing its building style and aligned with its main architectural features.  Further excavation is required to establish the breadth and depth of the hall, and to determine whether it can be securely identified as the ‘missing’ mosque.

 

Introduction

            A three-week season of excavations was conducted at al-Sinnabra, under the joint direction of Drs Tawfiq Da’adli (Hebrew University), Donald Whitcomb (University of Chicago) and Raphael Greenberg (Tel Aviv University), and with the participation of Alon Arad (field supervisor), Veronica Morriss (asst. supervisor and phographer), Slava Pirsky (surveyor), Sasha Flit (photographer), and workers from Sakhnin and Shefa‘amr.  Our work was coordinated with the Israel Antiquities Authority and National Parks Authority, who have begun conservation work at the site, and with the managers of the Ohalo Manor hotel and the Kinneret cemetery, which border the site.

            In our proposal for this excavation we pointed to two lacunae in our knowledge of the qasr, at least one of which may have begun to be filled after the first excavation season.  The proposal included this paragraph:

“With the interior of the palace and its southern façade cleared in its entirety, the absence of a mosque is striking.  Mosques were a regular feature in Umayyad palaces such as in Khirbat al-Mafjar and Khirbat al-Minya, if we just consider the palaces on the Jordan valley and on the shore of the Tabariyya lake (Creswell 1989; Ettinghausen, Grabar and Jenkins-Madina 2003).  Since the Ṣinnabra palace shows ample evidence for piecemeal, modular construction, with rooms added to the central basilica and the bathhouse built after the fortification, it is likely that the mosque was attached to the palace on one of its unexcavated sides.  The most likely candidate is the northern side, where a narrow trench excavated between the citadel and the church to its north revealed an ashlar stairway leading to a raised platform at the northwest corner of the fortified enceinte.  The area was never excavated, beyond the confines of the trench, but was partly covered by the excavation dumps.  Additional structures cut by the trench might be palace outbuildings.”

            Moreover, in our recent report, Bet Yeraḥ III: Hellenistic Philoteria and Islamic al-Sinnabra, we recount confirmations that the Caliph Mu'awiya spent winters and preached in Sinnabra, presumably in its mosque (Da’adli 2017, 126).  If the "fortified palace" may be taken as the dar al-imara for this community, one may expect the mosque should be located immediately to its north, following patterns of many early Islamic cities.

 

The Excavations      

            The new excavations of February 2018 were intended to explore this possibility, i.e. to search for the mosque of Mu’awiya, datable to the later 7th century.  After almost three weeks of near frustration, due to the disturbed conditions of the site caused by the deposition of dumps and excavation backfill, the excavation of ditches and other recent interventions, we began to piece together information from six separate excavation trenches in the western part of the northern façade and from archival information gathered during our stay in the region, indicating that a broad, plaster-and-gravel paved court which we had been excavating was indeed part of the original palace complex.  This led to the opening of the final, westernmost trench, which provided startling confirmation of the possibility that we may have located the mosque.

            The large paved court revealed in the new excavations, extending north of the fortified enclosure, is securely dated by coins to the 7th century CE.  In its eastern half, just beneath its surface, the tops of two rows of large (> 1 m in diameter) pillar bases made of stone-and-mortar concrete and placed at regular intervals (fig.1), point to the existence of a large hypostyle hall, similar in conception to the halls of contemporary mosques in nearby Tiberias (Cytryn 2009) and in Damascus.

Daadli photo 1 1

Fig.1. The column bases, looking east.

            The description of that mosque is best expressed in the words of its excavator:

“It was of a modest size, ca. 48 x 21m, 7 by 11 aisles, separated by columns in secondary use, erected over rustic round foundations, cast into a deep fill, a technique introduced into Palestine after the Muslim conquest." (Cytryn-Silverman 2015, 207)

            These column foundations are of the same type as those at Sinnabra, and have the same dimensions.  Perhaps a better impression of such column foundations may be seen from examples excavated in the early Islamic mosque at Aqaba (then known as Ayla).  What is more interesting among these examples is that the size of these mosques is closely comparable:  Tabariyya, 48 x 21; Aqaba, ~50 x 31; and Anjar, 49 x 32.  While the interval between columns seems comparable among these mosques and the bases at Sinnabra, there is no evidence for the dimensions of this latter structure (fig.2).

Daadli photo 2.2

Fig.2. The trenches of February 2018 from west to east: stairway, gravel courtyard and the column bases.

Finds

           The second lacuna cited in our proposal was the dearth of artifacts that could be associated with the palace.  In this case, the results of the new excavations actually confirmed the results of earlier work: there are indeed remarkably few finds in the palace complex, which seems to have been stripped clean at the time of its abandonment, presumably in the 8th century CE.  A handful of ceramic fragments and five coins – four of them from the courtyard and hall and one from the re-excavation of the northwestern tower of the palace enclosure (Tower 4, fig.3) – can all be associated with the 7th and early 8th century occupation (fig.4).

Daadli photo 3

Fig.3. Arabo-Byzantine 7th century coins.

 

Conservation

            The palace of Al-Sinnabra forms a part of the Tel Bet Yerah National Park, which also includes the remains of a Byzantine-period church (of the 6th century CE) and the monumental ‘Granary’ of the Early Bronze Age city of Bet Yerah (c. 2900 BCE).  All three structures are included in a new conservation project launched jointly by the Israel Antiquities Authority and the Israel Nature and National Parks Authority, with the intention of making the site accessible to visitors by 2019, after decades of neglect.

Daadli photo 4.4

Fig.4. Stairway attached to Tower 4.

            In February, while the excavation was in session, a team of conservators launched the maintenance project, which is still ongoing.  Among other things, they have brought to light some forgotten corners of the site, including the Umayyad bathhouse and parts of the palace itself.  Hence, we would like to emphasize that – thanks to the generous support of the Max van Berchem foundation – not only is new important evidence being added to our understanding of early Umayyad palaces, but a synergy has been created between new research and the renovation of the archaeological park.  This, if we may add, is part of our vision concerning archaeological sites as purveyors of a rich heritage associated with the many different cultures that have left their footprint in the land.

Dr Tawfiq Daʿadli 
Department of Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies and Art History
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem

 

Bibliography

Creswell K.A.C.

1989    A Short Account of Early Muslim Architecture. Revised and supplemented by James W. Allan. Cairo.

Cytryn -Silverman, K.

2009       The Umayyad Mosque of Tiberias. Muqarnas 26: 37-61.

Cytryn-Silverman, K.

2015       Tiberias, from its foundation to the end of the Early Islamic Period. In Fiensy, D and Strage, J.R (eds), Galilee in the Late Second Temple and Mishnaic Periods, vol.2. Minneapolis. Pp.186-210.

Ettinghausen R., O. Grabar and M. Jenkins-Madina.

2003    Islamic Art and Architecture 650-1250, 2nd ed. Yale.

Greenberg, R., O. Tal and T. Da‘adli.

2017       Bet Yerah, Vol. III: Hellenistic Philoteria and Islamic al-Ṣinnabra. Jerusalem, IAA

Reports 61.